<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL: Pulling inventory from Ad.com?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cogmap.com/blog/2009/12/04/aol-pulling-inventory-from-ad-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cogmap.com/blog/2009/12/04/aol-pulling-inventory-from-ad-com/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of Cogmap, the Org Chart Wiki</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:29:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turner&#8217;s Jacobs On Audience Buying; Agencies To Profit Share With Clients; IPO News; The Holiday Shopping Spree</title>
		<link>http://www.cogmap.com/blog/2009/12/04/aol-pulling-inventory-from-ad-com/comment-page-1/#comment-2560</link>
		<dc:creator>Turner&#8217;s Jacobs On Audience Buying; Agencies To Profit Share With Clients; IPO News; The Holiday Shopping Spree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cogmap.com/blog/?p=598#comment-2560</guid>
		<description>[...] Former AOL product guru, Brent Halliburton, looks at recent news that Ad.com may no longer be able to sell AOL inventory. Halliburton notes that this would make sense for AOL as it looks to gain control of its inventory and drive higher eCPMs but notes the irony: &quot;The original investment thesis behind AOLs acquisition of Ad.com those many years ago was that if they owned their own remnant monetization engine, it would be smart because they could keep their margin.&quot; Read the post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Former AOL product guru, Brent Halliburton, looks at recent news that Ad.com may no longer be able to sell AOL inventory. Halliburton notes that this would make sense for AOL as it looks to gain control of its inventory and drive higher eCPMs but notes the irony: &quot;The original investment thesis behind AOLs acquisition of Ad.com those many years ago was that if they owned their own remnant monetization engine, it would be smart because they could keep their margin.&quot; Read the post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
